|
|
|
|
|
|
Validity:
86%
|
|
The Voyager flips to open.
|
Validity:
83%
|
|
|
|
Validity:
79%
|
|
The Voyager's touchscreen responds to objects.
|
Validity:
79%
|
|
|
|
Validity:
75%
|
|
The Voyager has two screens, one of them protected.
|
Validity:
66%
|
|
|
|
Validity:
54%
|
|
The LG Voyager has the following dimensions: 4.64” x 2.12” x 0.71”
|
Validity:
53%
|
|
|
|
Validity:
45%
|
|
Users of Voyager have buyers remorse after finding out that their phone will soon be obsolete.
Samsung SCH-U940 people have uncool phones now, but will soon be on top of the game when U940 is released.
|
Validity:
40%
|
|
The LG Voyager is available for purchase and has been reviewed countless times.
|
Validity:
38%
|
|
|
|
Validity:
36%
|
|
|
|
Validity:
31%
|
|
The LG Voyager (VX10000) is considerably smaller than the Samsung SCH-u940. If the Voyager will include the same or similar feature set as the u940, it should appeal more toward Verizon Wireless customers.
Original touch design created for the 1st model (Samsung F700), but it possibly won't be included on the CDMA model (Samsung SCH-U940).
|
Validity:
30%
|
|
|
|
Validity:
26%
|
|
pending review
The LG Voyager has a full HTML browser.
2
The Samsung Glyde (u940...was renamed) also has a full HTML browser.
3
|
Validity:
90%
|
|
pending review
The Voyager has mobile TV.
3
The Samsung Glyde doesn't have mobile TV.
3
|
Validity:
84%
|
|
pending review
The Voyager is bulkier.
|
Validity:
77%
|
|
pending review
The voyager does not have interactive backgrounds.
The glyde has cool interactive backgrounds like a virtual rubics cube.
4
|
Validity:
71%
|
|
pending review
The voyager is not original.
The Glyde (old one: F700) came out in UK before iPhone or Voyager came out in the US.
|
Validity:
66%
|
|
The Samsung Glyde does not have a D-Pad
|
Validity:
57%
|
|
pending review
i have a voyager and i asolutly love it! and the glyde is copied by the voyager!
i think glyde may look cooler but doesnt have the same quality as a voyager and it is the copier!
|
Validity:
50%
|
|
pending review
The voyager got relatively high editor reviews on cnet.
The glyde got relatively low editor reviews on cnet.
|
Validity:
50%
|
|
pending review
The LG Voyager is huge like a brick, looks gross, is heavy, and oldddd.
The Samsung Glyde looks cooler, is lighter, feels better to hold, and is newer.
|
Validity:
50%
|
|
pending review
the LG Voyager's price starts at $299 for a 2-year agreement.
the Samsung Glyde's price starts at $199 for a 2-year agreement.
|
Validity:
50%
|
|
pending review
fuck the voyager
5
|
Validity:
50%
|
|
pending review
looks ugly
|
Validity:
50%
|
|
pending review
IS A MUCH BETTER PHONE.
IS OK.. BUT ITS NOT AN ORIGINAL.
|
Validity:
42%
|
|
pending review
The LG Voyager has a roomy keyboard.
The Samsung Glyde has a cramped keyboard.
|
Validity:
37%
|
|
pending review
Voyager doesn't have a customizable shortcuts menu
|
Validity:
33%
|
|
pending review
bla bla bla
|
Validity:
33%
|
|
And Samsung Glyde has a little cocaroche atenna dick
|
Validity:
30%
|
|
the samsung glyde is not for a MAN
|
Validity:
30%
|
|
pending review
Voyager is an original
the Glyde just copied the Voyager
|
Validity:
21%
|
|
the samsung glyde actually has a 3.0 mp camera.
|
Validity:
12%
|
|
pending review
The LG Voyager has a 2.0 Megapixel Camera.
The Samsung Glyde really has a 1.3 Megapixel Camera. Just inflated numbers
|
Validity:
10%
|
|
Add my point
(No sign in required!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
